If you haven't already noticed, the Airzona Diamondbacks had a team color, semi-name change for this past season. The purple and team team changed their jresey colors to red and black and on the front torso lettering reads, "D-backs." Even the "A" on the caps has had some alternations done to it, now that it sits in a slightly veering circle.
This just got me thinking, about how baseball really doesn't need another red team. I mean there are already: Angels, Phillies, Cardinals, Nationals, Reds, Red Sox, and the Astros. The even more common color found in baseball would be blue: Twins, Indians, Royals, Brewers, Braves, Blue Jays, Cubs, Dogders, Mariners, Padres, and the Rangers.
I am no fan of the A's, the Giants or the Pirates but I will hand it those teams for standing out with thier color combinations. But my overall point is that I want to see a baseball team in Bronco or Viking Colors, or pink and black!
"Semper ubi, sub ubi!"--H.Mo.
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
Monday, October 8, 2007
Welcome to the Loyolan Sports Blog
Welcome to The Los Angeles Loyolan's Sports Blog. This is the place for Sports section writers to post their sports related tangents, thoughts, comments, etc. that may not have made into the published pages of Loyola Marymount's newspaper.
As of now, the sight is still under minor construction. However, we will be up and running soon. Look for material posted by myself, my fellow editors, and our staff writers.
As of now, the sight is still under minor construction. However, we will be up and running soon. Look for material posted by myself, my fellow editors, and our staff writers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
